According to scientists, the pink throughout the galaxy indicates the presence of hydrogen. If that is true, and I have no reason to doubt it, my question is how did that come out of a big bang.
Hubble's big bang theory, that is so widely accepted by today's scientists, simply does not explain the vastness of gas and solid material that would be required to make this galaxy and all the millions more.
I personally believe that if they were to take the big bang out of their thinking and embrace divine design, scientific knowledge would increase exponentially. The whole of the universe is full of amazingly complex physics that could hardly come from a random accident in the form of the "big bang theory" Let's get real for a moment. An explosion results in chaos nor organization. Planets orbiting around suns orbiting around a central point in a galaxy, orbiting around, only God knows what, can hardly be caused from an explosion.
Consider this ... a small planet explodes and leaves a mess of jagged asteroids floating in a neat orbit around the sun, between Mars and Jupiter. Unlike their neighbors, almost perfectly round planets also orbiting the sun. If this was the work of a big bang, it certainly was able to sculpture beautiful symmetry and organization. No, there is something desperately wrong with the "big bang theory"
Taking this thought one step further. If this Galaxy is 30 million light years away from our Sun, how far is it away from the so called "big bang" location. Let's just assume for this argument, that our Sun was the origin of the "big bang", and that the rate of expansion from the ground zero, was the speed of light (not), that would mean it took 30 million light years to get to it's present position, based on Hubble's theory of an expanding universe.
Anyway you slice it, the big bang theory is so full of holes, it should have sunk already.
See the full report here. http://www.nasa.gov/mission_pages/hubble/science/ngc7090.html
No comments:
Post a Comment